Customer portal
Articles Tagged with

SOS Intelligence

"Cyber
Product news

A Special Cyber Threat Intelligence Plan for UK Charities, NHS Trusts and Schools

We like brands, companies and organisations that do the right thing. They are for good. They want to help. Their product or service is helpful, is useful and goes some way to fight the bad in the world, and let’s face it, there is way too much of that right now.

So, we are also going to try and do the right thing. We are a startup, a fledgling business and one which has not got endless reserves and pots of cash. But, we strongly believe that by helping people we can develop a loyal customer in the future…

From today, if you are a UK charity, a NHS trust or UK school, you can apply for a special account with SOS Intelligence, which gives you the first six months for free. An application takes seconds and once approved, you can up and running in minutes. We are offering this as we know this can make a huge difference to your cyber security, and we know that is more and more important.

Apply here.

What does this account include?

  • 10 Keyword Limit
  • 3 User Account Limit
  • Breach Monitoring, OSINT & Dark Web 
  • Excludes Domain Monitoring. 
  • Email Notification.

After the six months free time period, this will cost £200+VAT per month or £1,920+VAT with a 20% discount for 1 year.


We have seen time and time again that organisations who don’t act, even with intelligence we’ve come across ourselves, leave themselves open to tremendous risk.

Charities at increased risk

A new threat report published by the NCSC reveals why the charity sector is particular vulnerable to cyber attacks, the methods used by criminals, and how charities can best defend themselves.

 “More charities are now offering online services and fundraising online, meaning reliable, trusted digital services are more important than ever. During the Ukraine crisis, we saw more criminals taking advantage of the generosity of the public, masquerading as charities for their own financial gain.”
Lindy Cameron, NCSC CEO

You can read their blog post here and download the report here.

Just one set of compromised credentials is it all takes. Imagine, if you will, knowing when a user has been compromised and so you can act and secure the account. Imagine seeing an alert, almost in real time, where some of your data has been posted on a dark web forum.

Intelligence means you can do something about it.

Please do share this far and wide – we want to help! 🙂

Apply here.



FAQs

  1. Who can apply? This is open for any UK charity, NHS trust or school. If you are a non-profit, don’t fit in these categories, but think you should be considered, you can fill out the form here and click no to the fit question – you will be prompted to enter more information and we will get back to you.
  2. How long is the free account for? It is for six months from the date of account sign up. When this period has finished, you will be charged on the card you used for sign up. The annual version gives you a 20% discount and is by far the most popular option.
  3. What if I don’t want to continue using SOS Intelligence? You will need to tell us prior to the end of the six months as otherwise you may be charged.
  4. Do you provide training? At present, we offer email support and screencasts to get you up and running.
  5. What is the process to apply? To apply, head on over to the application form here and we will be in touch as soon as possible. If successful you will receive an email with a link to sign up and a voucher code to use to give you the six month free access. 
  6. Do I need to add credit card details on sign up? Yes, we use Stripe for payment and this requires card details. However, you will not be initially charged as you will use a six month free voucher. At the end of the six months the plan will renew using the card details provided.
  7. What about domain / typo / squatting monitoring? This is not included on this plan but is on the Pro or Enterprise plans.
  8. What is typo-squatting? Typo-squatting is the act of registering domain names, i.e. Web Domains that look similar to your legitimate domain name. Cyber Criminals may by several domains across a number of different Top Level Domain Registrars. Typo-squatting could be used against you, as a business to phish your employees or customers or in order to contact fraud under your name or brand. Most common occurrence is 419 Advance Fee Fraud. 

    SOS Intelligence monitors recently registered domain names from a large number of Top Level Domain Registrars and scans those against you domain type keywords.
"SOS
CVE Top 10

The SOS Intelligence CVE Chatter Weekly Top Ten – 30 January 2023

 

This weekly blog post is from via our unique intelligence collection pipelines. We are your eyes and ears online, including the Dark Web.

There are thousands of vulnerability discussions each week. SOS Intelligence gathers a list of the most discussed Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) online for the previous week.

We make every effort to ensure the accuracy of the data presented. As this is an automated process some errors may creep in.

If you are feeling generous please do make us aware of anything you spot, feel free to follow us on Twitter @sosintel and DM us. Thank you!

 


 

1.  CVE-2021-43008

Improper Access Control in Adminer versions 1.12.0 to 4.6.2 (fixed in version 4.6.3) allows an attacker to achieve Arbitrary File Read on the remote server by requesting the Adminer to connect to a remote MySQL database.

https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-43008

 


 

2. CVE-2022-34689

Windows CryptoAPI Spoofing Vulnerability.

https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-34689

 


 

3. CVE-2022-40684

An authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel [CWE-288] in Fortinet FortiOS version 7.2.0 through 7.2.1 and 7.0.0 through 7.0.6, FortiProxy version 7.2.0 and version 7.0.0 through 7.0.6 and FortiSwitchManager version 7.2.0 and 7.0.0 allows an unauthenticated atttacker to perform operations on the administrative interface via specially crafted HTTP or HTTPS requests.

https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-40684

 


 

4. CVE-2021-44228

Apache Log4j2 2.0-beta9 through 2.15.0 (excluding security releases 2.12.2, 2.12.3, and 2.3.1) JNDI features used in configuration, log messages, and parameters do not protect against attacker controlled LDAP and other JNDI related endpoints. An attacker who can control log messages or log message parameters can execute arbitrary code loaded from LDAP servers when message lookup substitution is enabled. From log4j 2.15.0, this behavior has been disabled by default. From version 2.16.0 (along with 2.12.2, 2.12.3, and 2.3.1), this functionality has been completely removed. Note that this vulnerability is specific to log4j-core and does not affect log4net, log4cxx, or other Apache Logging Services projects.

https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-44228

 


 

5. CVE-2022-24706

Vulnerability in the Oracle Web Services Manager product of Oracle Fusion Middleware (component: Web Services Security). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.1.3.0 and 12.2.1.4.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Web Services Manager. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle Web Services Manager accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Web Services Manager accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.1 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N).

https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-24706

 


 

6. CVE-2018-17144

Bitcoin Core 0.14.x before 0.14.3, 0.15.x before 0.15.2, and 0.16.x before 0.16.3 and Bitcoin Knots 0.14.x through 0.16.x before 0.16.3 allow a remote denial of service (application crash) exploitable by miners via duplicate input. An attacker can make bitcoind or Bitcoin-Qt crash.

https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-17144

 


 

7. CVE-2023-24055

** DISPUTED ** KeePass through 2.53 (in a default installation) allows an attacker, who has write access to the XML configuration file, to obtain the cleartext passwords by adding an export trigger. NOTE: the vendor’s position is that the password database is not intended to be secure against an attacker who has that level of access to the local PC.

https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-24055

 


 

8. CVE-2022-22960

Vulnerability in the Oracle Web Services Manager product of Oracle Fusion Middleware (component: Web Services Security). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.1.3.0 and 12.2.1.4.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Web Services Manager. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle Web Services Manager accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Web Services Manager accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.1 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N).

https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-22960

 


 

9. CVE-2022-4255

An info leak issue was identified in all versions of GitLab EE from 13.7 prior to 15.4.6, 15.5 prior to 15.5.5, and 15.6 prior to 15.6.1 which exposes user email id through webhook payload.

https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-4255

 


 

10. CVE-2022-41082

In Apache CouchDB prior to 3.2.2, an attacker can access an improperly secured default installation without authenticating and gain admin privileges. The CouchDB documentation has always made recommendations for properly securing an installation, including recommending using a firewall in front of all CouchDB installations.

https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-41082

 


"SOS
CVE Top 10

The SOS Intelligence CVE Chatter Weekly Top Ten – 23 January 2023

 

This weekly blog post is from via our unique intelligence collection pipelines. We are your eyes and ears online, including the Dark Web.

There are thousands of vulnerability discussions each week. SOS Intelligence gathers a list of the most discussed Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) online for the previous week.

We make every effort to ensure the accuracy of the data presented. As this is an automated process some errors may creep in.

If you are feeling generous please do make us aware of anything you spot, feel free to follow us on Twitter @sosintel and DM us. Thank you!

 


 

1.  CVE-2022-23087

N/A

https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-23087

 


 

2. CVE-2022-40684

Windows Endpoint Configuration Manager Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability.

https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-40684

 


 

3. CVE-2022-39197

An XSS (Cross Site Scripting) vulnerability was found in HelpSystems Cobalt Strike through 4.7 that allowed a remote attacker to execute HTML on the Cobalt Strike teamserver. To exploit the vulnerability, one must first inspect a Cobalt Strike payload, and then modify the username field in the payload (or create a new payload with the extracted information and then modify that username field to be malformed).

https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-39197

 


 

4. CVE-2022-21661

WordPress is a free and open-source content management system written in PHP and paired with a MariaDB database. Due to improper sanitization in WP_Query, there can be cases where SQL injection is possible through plugins or themes that use it in a certain way. This has been patched in WordPress version 5.8.3. Older affected versions are also fixed via security release, that go back till 3.7.37. We strongly recommend that you keep auto-updates enabled. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability.

https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-21661

 


 

5. CVE-2018-17144

Bitcoin Core 0.14.x before 0.14.3, 0.15.x before 0.15.2, and 0.16.x before 0.16.3 and Bitcoin Knots 0.14.x through 0.16.x before 0.16.3 allow a remote denial of service (application crash) exploitable by miners via duplicate input. An attacker can make bitcoind or Bitcoin-Qt crash.

https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-17144

 


 

6. CVE-2022-41903

Git is distributed revision control system. `git log` can display commits in an arbitrary format using its `–format` specifiers. This functionality is also exposed to `git archive` via the `export-subst` gitattribute. When processing the padding operators, there is a integer overflow in `pretty.c::format_and_pad_commit()` where a `size_t` is stored improperly as an `int`, and then added as an offset to a `memcpy()`. This overflow can be triggered directly by a user running a command which invokes the commit formatting machinery (e.g., `git log –format=…`). It may also be triggered indirectly through git archive via the export-subst mechanism, which expands format specifiers inside of files within the repository during a git archive. This integer overflow can result in arbitrary heap writes, which may result in arbitrary code execution. The problem has been patched in the versions published on 2023-01-17, going back to v2.30.7. Users are advised to upgrade. Users who are unable to upgrade should disable `git archive` in untrusted repositories. If you expose git archive via `git daemon`, disable it by running `git config –global daemon.uploadArch false`.

https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-41903

 


 

7. CVE-2022-46164

NodeBB is an open source Node.js based forum software. Due to a plain object with a prototype being used in socket.io message handling a specially crafted payload can be used to impersonate other users and takeover accounts. This vulnerability has been patched in version 2.6.1. Users are advised to upgrade. Users unable to upgrade may cherry-pick commit `48d143921753914da45926cca6370a92ed0c46b8` into their codebase to patch the exploit.

https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-46164

 


 

8. CVE-2022-21662

WordPress is a free and open-source content management system written in PHP and paired with a MariaDB database. Due to improper sanitization in WP_Query, there can be cases where SQL injection is possible through plugins or themes that use it in a certain way. This has been patched in WordPress version 5.8.3. Older affected versions are also fixed via security release, that go back till 3.7.37. We strongly recommend that you keep auto-updates enabled. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability.

https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-21662

 


 

9. CVE-2022-47966

Multiple Zoho ManageEngine on-premise products, such as ServiceDesk Plus through 14003, allow remote code execution due to use of Apache xmlsec (aka XML Security for Java) 1.4.1, because the xmlsec XSLT features, by design in that version, make the application responsible for certain security protections, and the ManageEngine applications did not provide those protections.

https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-47966

 


 

10. CVE-2022-46169

Cacti is an open source platform which provides a robust and extensible operational monitoring and fault management framework for users. In affected versions a command injection vulnerability allows an unauthenticated user to execute arbitrary code on a server running Cacti, if a specific data source was selected for any monitored device. The vulnerability resides in the `remote_agent.php` file. This file can be accessed without authentication. This function retrieves the IP address of the client via `get_client_addr` and resolves this IP address to the corresponding hostname via `gethostbyaddr`. After this, it is verified that an entry within the `poller` table exists, where the hostname corresponds to the resolved hostname. If such an entry was found, the function returns `true` and the client is authorized. This authorization can be bypassed due to the implementation of the `get_client_addr` function. The function is defined in the file `lib/functions.php` and checks serval `$_SERVER` variables to determine the IP address of the client. The variables beginning with `HTTP_` can be arbitrarily set by an attacker. Since there is a default entry in the `poller` table with the hostname of the server running Cacti, an attacker can bypass the authentication e.g. by providing the header `Forwarded-For: `. This way the function `get_client_addr` returns the IP address of the server running Cacti. The following call to `gethostbyaddr` will resolve this IP address to the hostname of the server, which will pass the `poller` hostname check because of the default entry. After the authorization of the `remote_agent.php` file is bypassed, an attacker can trigger different actions. One of these actions is called `polldata`. The called function `poll_for_data` retrieves a few request parameters and loads the corresponding `poller_item` entries from the database. If the `action` of a `poller_item` equals `POLLER_ACTION_SCRIPT_PHP`, the function `proc_open` is used to execute a PHP script. The attacker-controlled parameter `$poller_id` is retrieved via the function `get_nfilter_request_var`, which allows arbitrary strings. This variable is later inserted into the string passed to `proc_open`, which leads to a command injection vulnerability. By e.g. providing the `poller_id=;id` the `id` command is executed. In order to reach the vulnerable call, the attacker must provide a `host_id` and `local_data_id`, where the `action` of the corresponding `poller_item` is set to `POLLER_ACTION_SCRIPT_PHP`. Both of these ids (`host_id` and `local_data_id`) can easily be bruteforced. The only requirement is that a `poller_item` with an `POLLER_ACTION_SCRIPT_PHP` action exists. This is very likely on a productive instance because this action is added by some predefined templates like `Device – Uptime` or `Device – Polling Time`. This command injection vulnerability allows an unauthenticated user to execute arbitrary commands if a `poller_item` with the `action` type `

https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-46169

 


"SOS
CVE Top 10

The SOS Intelligence CVE Chatter Weekly Top Ten – 16 January 2023

 

This weekly blog post is from via our unique intelligence collection pipelines. We are your eyes and ears online, including the Dark Web.

There are thousands of vulnerability discussions each week. SOS Intelligence gathers a list of the most discussed Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) online for the previous week.

We make every effort to ensure the accuracy of the data presented. As this is an automated process some errors may creep in.

If you are feeling generous please do make us aware of anything you spot, feel free to follow us on Twitter @sosintel and DM us. Thank you!

 


 

1.  CVE-2022-41080

Microsoft Exchange Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2022-41123.

https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-41080

 


 

2. CVE-2022-42475

A heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability [CWE-122] in FortiOS SSL-VPN 7.2.0 through 7.2.2, 7.0.0 through 7.0.8, 6.4.0 through 6.4.10, 6.2.0 through 6.2.11, 6.0.15 and earlier and FortiProxy SSL-VPN 7.2.0 through 7.2.1, 7.0.7 and earlier may allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code or commands via specifically crafted requests.

https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-42475

 


 

3. CVE-2022-40684

An authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel [CWE-288] in Fortinet FortiOS version 7.2.0 through 7.2.1 and 7.0.0 through 7.0.6, FortiProxy version 7.2.0 and version 7.0.0 through 7.0.6 and FortiSwitchManager version 7.2.0 and 7.0.0 allows an unauthenticated atttacker to perform operations on the administrative interface via specially crafted HTTP or HTTPS requests.

https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-40684

 


 

4. CVE-2022-41082

Microsoft Exchange Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability.

https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-41082

 


 

5. CVE-2021-26404

Improper input validation and bounds checking in SEV firmware may leak scratch buffer bytes leading to potential information disclosure.

https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-26404

 


 

6. CVE-2014-12507

N/A

https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2014-12507

 


 

7. CVE-2022-23087

N/A

https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-23087

 


 

8. CVE-2014-12502

N/A

https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2014-12502

 


 

9. CVE-2023-22417

A Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime vulnerability in the Flow Processing Daemon (flowd) of Juniper Networks Junos OS allows a network-based, unauthenticated attacker to cause a Denial of Service (DoS). In an IPsec VPN environment, a memory leak will be seen if a DH or ECDH group is configured. Eventually the flowd process will crash and restart. This issue affects Juniper Networks Junos OS on SRX Series: All versions prior to 19.3R3-S7; 19.4 versions prior to 19.4R2-S8, 19.4R3-S10; 20.2 versions prior to 20.2R3-S6; 20.3 versions prior to 20.3R3-S5; 20.4 versions prior to 20.4R3-S5; 21.1 versions prior to 21.1R3-S4; 21.2 versions prior to 21.2R3; 21.3 versions prior to 21.3R3; 21.4 versions prior to 21.4R2.

https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-22417

 


 

10. CVE-2014-12503

N/A

https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2014-12503

 


"SOS
CVE Top 10

The SOS Intelligence CVE Chatter Weekly Top Ten – 09 January 2023

 

This weekly blog post is from via our unique intelligence collection pipelines. We are your eyes and ears online, including the Dark Web.

There are thousands of vulnerability discussions each week. SOS Intelligence gathers a list of the most discussed Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) online for the previous week.

We make every effort to ensure the accuracy of the data presented. As this is an automated process some errors may creep in.

If you are feeling generous please do make us aware of anything you spot, feel free to follow us on Twitter @sosintel and DM us. Thank you!

 


 

1.  CVE-2012-2459

Unspecified vulnerability in bitcoind and Bitcoin-Qt before 0.4.6, 0.5.x before 0.5.5, 0.6.0.x before 0.6.0.7, and 0.6.x before 0.6.2 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (block-processing outage and incorrect block count) via unknown behavior on a Bitcoin network.

https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2012-2459

 


 

2. CVE-2022-46490

GPAC version 2.1-DEV-rev505-gb9577e6ad-master was discovered to contain a memory leak via the afrt_box_read function at box_code_adobe.c.

https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-46490

 


 

3. CVE-2022-46489

GPAC version 2.1-DEV-rev505-gb9577e6ad-master was discovered to contain a memory leak via the gf_isom_box_parse_ex function at box_funcs.c.

https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-46489

 


 

4. CVE-2021-38003

Inappropriate implementation in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 95.0.4638.69 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page.

https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-38003

 


 

5. CVE-2022-41080

Microsoft Exchange Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2022-41123.

https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-41080

 


 

6. CVE-2018-17144

Bitcoin Core 0.14.x before 0.14.3, 0.15.x before 0.15.2, and 0.16.x before 0.16.3 and Bitcoin Knots 0.14.x through 0.16.x before 0.16.3 allow a remote denial of service (application crash) exploitable by miners via duplicate input. An attacker can make bitcoind or Bitcoin-Qt crash.

https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-17144

 


 

7. CVE-2022-41082

Microsoft Exchange Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability.

https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-41082

 


 

8. CVE-2022-23087

N/A

https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-23087

 


 

9. CVE-2022-4025

Inappropriate implementation in Paint in Google Chrome prior to 98.0.4758.80 allowed a remote attacker to leak cross-origin data outside an iframe via a crafted HTML page. (Chrome security severity: Low)

https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-4025

 


 

10. CVE-2022-46164

N/A

https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-46164

 


"SOS
SOS Intelligence Webinar

Our webinar schedule

Firstly, a very Happy New Year to you! We hope you had a terrific festive period, recharged the batteries and avoided getting the “worst cold ever” – we sadly didn’t and are still recovering!

Following our first webinar in December we are going to be doing regularly events through out this year.

We are using a terrific platform called Livestorm which allows you to sign up in seconds, receive timely reminder emails and during the event, ask questions and answer polls 🙂

We have a dedicated page with the schedule on, which you can find here.

We will be constantly adding to this throughout the year, so we look forward to welcoming you!

"SOS
CVE Top 10

The SOS Intelligence CVE Chatter Weekly Top Ten – 02 January 2023

 

This weekly blog post is from via our unique intelligence collection pipelines. We are your eyes and ears online, including the Dark Web.

There are thousands of vulnerability discussions each week. SOS Intelligence gathers a list of the most discussed Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) online for the previous week.

We make every effort to ensure the accuracy of the data presented. As this is an automated process some errors may creep in.

If you are feeling generous please do make us aware of anything you spot, feel free to follow us on Twitter @sosintel and DM us. Thank you!

 


 

1.  CVE-2022-40684

Windows Print Spooler Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2022-22022, CVE-2022-22041, CVE-2022-30226.

https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-40684

 


 

2. CVE-2021-38385

Tor before 0.3.5.16, 0.4.5.10, and 0.4.6.7 mishandles the relationship between batch-signature verification and single-signature verification, leading to a remote assertion failure, aka TROVE-2021-007.

https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-38385

 


 

3. CVE-2022-41082

Microsoft Exchange Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability.

https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-41082

 


 

4. CVE-2022-41040

Microsoft Exchange Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability.

https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-41040

 


 

5. CVE-2012-2459

Unspecified vulnerability in bitcoind and Bitcoin-Qt before 0.4.6, 0.5.x before 0.5.5, 0.6.0.x before 0.6.0.7, and 0.6.x before 0.6.2 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (block-processing outage and incorrect block count) via unknown behavior on a Bitcoin network.

https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2012-2459

 


 

6. CVE-2022-27510

Unauthenticated remote arbitrary code execution

https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-27510

 


 

7. CVE-2022-27518

Unauthenticated remote arbitrary code execution

https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-27518

 


 

8. CVE-2020-36619

A vulnerability was found in multimon-ng. It has been rated as critical. This issue affects the function add_ch of the file demod_flex.c. The manipulation of the argument ch leads to format string. Upgrading to version 1.2.0 is able to address this issue. The name of the patch is e5a51c508ef952e81a6da25b43034dd1ed023c07. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component. The identifier VDB-216269 was assigned to this vulnerability.

https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-36619

 


 

9. CVE-2014-12502

N/A

https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2014-12502

 


 

10. CVE-2016-20018

Knex Knex.js through 2.3.0 has a limited SQL injection vulnerability that can be exploited to ignore the WHERE clause of a SQL query.

https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-20018

 


"SOS
CVE Top 10

The SOS Intelligence CVE Chatter Weekly Top Ten – 26 December 2022

 

This weekly blog post is from via our unique intelligence collection pipelines. We are your eyes and ears online, including the Dark Web.

There are thousands of vulnerability discussions each week. SOS Intelligence gathers a list of the most discussed Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) online for the previous week.

We make every effort to ensure the accuracy of the data presented. As this is an automated process some errors may creep in.

If you are feeling generous please do make us aware of anything you spot, feel free to follow us on Twitter @sosintel and DM us. Thank you!

 


 

1.  CVE-2022-4415

N/A

https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-4415

 


 

2. CVE-2022-41080

Microsoft Exchange Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2022-41123.

https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-41080

 


 

3. CVE-2012-2459

Unspecified vulnerability in bitcoind and Bitcoin-Qt before 0.4.6, 0.5.x before 0.5.5, 0.6.0.x before 0.6.0.7, and 0.6.x before 0.6.2 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (block-processing outage and incorrect block count) via unknown behavior on a Bitcoin network.

https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2012-2459

 


 

4. CVE-2018-17144

Bitcoin Core 0.14.x before 0.14.3, 0.15.x before 0.15.2, and 0.16.x before 0.16.3 and Bitcoin Knots 0.14.x through 0.16.x before 0.16.3 allow a remote denial of service (application crash) exploitable by miners via duplicate input. An attacker can make bitcoind or Bitcoin-Qt crash.

https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-17144

 


 

5. CVE-2022-40684

An authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel [CWE-288] in Fortinet FortiOS version 7.2.0 through 7.2.1 and 7.0.0 through 7.0.6, FortiProxy version 7.2.0 and version 7.0.0 through 7.0.6 and FortiSwitchManager version 7.2.0 and 7.0.0 allows an unauthenticated atttacker to perform operations on the administrative interface via specially crafted HTTP or HTTPS requests.

https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-40684

 


 

6. CVE-2022-41082

Microsoft Exchange Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability.

https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-41082

 


 

7. CVE-2022-47941

An issue was discovered in ksmbd in the Linux kernel before 5.19.2. fs/ksmbd/smb2pdu.c omits a kfree call in certain smb2_handle_negotiate error conditions, aka a memory leak.

https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-47941

 


 

8. CVE-2022-41040

Microsoft Exchange Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability.

https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-41040

 


 

9. CVE-2016-20018

Knex Knex.js through 2.3.0 has a limited SQL injection vulnerability that can be exploited to ignore the WHERE clause of a SQL query.

https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-20018

 


 

10. CVE-2022-41649

A heap out of bounds read vulnerability exists in the handling of IPTC data while parsing TIFF images in OpenImageIO v2.3.19.0. A specially-crafted TIFF file can cause a read of adjacent heap memory, which can leak sensitive process information. An attacker can provide a malicious file to trigger this vulnerability.

https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-41649

 


"SOS
CVE Top 10

The SOS Intelligence CVE Chatter Weekly Top Ten – 19 December 2022

 

This weekly blog post is from via our unique intelligence collection pipelines. We are your eyes and ears online, including the Dark Web.

There are thousands of vulnerability discussions each week. SOS Intelligence gathers a list of the most discussed Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) online for the previous week.

We make every effort to ensure the accuracy of the data presented. As this is an automated process some errors may creep in.

If you are feeling generous please do make us aware of anything you spot, feel free to follow us on Twitter @sosintel and DM us. Thank you!

 


 

1.  CVE-2018-17144

Bitcoin Core 0.14.x before 0.14.3, 0.15.x before 0.15.2, and 0.16.x before 0.16.3 and Bitcoin Knots 0.14.x through 0.16.x before 0.16.3 allow a remote denial of service (application crash) exploitable by miners via duplicate input. An attacker can make bitcoind or Bitcoin-Qt crash.

https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-17144

 


 

2. CVE-2012-2459

Unspecified vulnerability in bitcoind and Bitcoin-Qt before 0.4.6, 0.5.x before 0.5.5, 0.6.0.x before 0.6.0.7, and 0.6.x before 0.6.2 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (block-processing outage and incorrect block count) via unknown behavior on a Bitcoin network.

https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2012-2459

 


 

3. CVE-2022-42475

N/A

https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-42475

 


 

4. CVE-2022-40684

An authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel [CWE-288] in Fortinet FortiOS version 7.2.0 through 7.2.1 and 7.0.0 through 7.0.6, FortiProxy version 7.2.0 and version 7.0.0 through 7.0.6 and FortiSwitchManager version 7.2.0 and 7.0.0 allows an unauthenticated atttacker to perform operations on the administrative interface via specially crafted HTTP or HTTPS requests.

https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-40684

 


 

5. CVE-2022-44698

Windows SmartScreen Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability.

https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-44698

 


 

6. CVE-2022-41049

Windows Mark of the Web Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2022-41091.

https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-41049

 


 

7. CVE-2022-27518

Unauthenticated remote arbitrary code execution

https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-27518

 


 

8. CVE-2022-20240

In sOpAllowSystemRestrictionBypass of AppOpsManager.java, there is a possible leak of location information due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-12 Android-12LAndroid ID: A-231496105

https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-20240

 


 

9. CVE-2022-22965

A Spring MVC or Spring WebFlux application running on JDK 9+ may be vulnerable to remote code execution (RCE) via data binding. The specific exploit requires the application to run on Tomcat as a WAR deployment. If the application is deployed as a Spring Boot executable jar, i.e. the default, it is not vulnerable to the exploit. However, the nature of the vulnerability is more general, and there may be other ways to exploit it.

https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-22965

 


 

10. CVE-2021-3821

A potential security vulnerability has been identified for certain HP multifunction printers (MFPs). The vulnerability may lead to Denial of Service when running HP Workpath solutions on potentially affected products.

https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-3821

 


"Dark
Investigation, The Dark Web

Dark Web Services Current Average Prices

It started with a tweet.

The dark web has long been associated with illegal activities and the sale of illicit goods and services. Among the many services offered on the dark web, hacking services are particularly prevalent.

Daniel’s tweet

We had our PIR and got to writing an Intelligence Requirements sheet following the PESTLEP model and that allowed us to prioritise our Collection Plan.

Collection plan.

With which we were able to start our collection process and begin answering Daniel Card’s Tweet.

The collection process consisted of using the SOS Intelligence platform to identify current active market places for the specific IR areas we had to answer to.

Our platform has the capability to scan the dark web very quickly, with the ability to rotate around all active Onion services within 24-48 hours. This gives us a clear view of current and active Onion services.

In addition SOS Intelligence has a broad range of automatic closed and open forum collection giving us a real time view into purchases and sales.

Gathering the relevant information and calculating averages per service, per market place. 

The research

The research for this article looked at around 40 different current dark web marketplaces and clear web and dark web forums, where hacking services are commonly offered for sale. The average prices for the services mentioned were determined based on the information gathered from these sources.

According to our research, the average price for a stolen credit card on the dark web is around $243.15.

This may seem like a low price, but the value of a stolen credit card can vary depending on the country it was issued in and the remaining balance on the card. For example, a credit card from the United States may be worth more than one from a less economically developed country. To keep things as like for like as possible we took the average card limit for a USA bank.

Counterfeit money is also commonly available on the dark web, with the average price per $1,000 coming in at around $396.24.

This may seem like a high price, but it’s important to remember that producing high-quality counterfeit money can be a time-consuming and expensive process.

Botnets, which are networks of compromised computers used to launch distributed denial of service (DDoS) attacks, are also commonly available on the dark web.

The average price for a botnet or DDoS attack is around $382.41.

Another common service offered on the dark web is the sale of  so called residential proxies,  which are more difficult to detect and block as they “proxy” a cyber criminals connection out through a residential ISP. These proxies are used to mask the true IP address of the user and are often used by hackers to avoid detection.

The average price for a residential proxy is around $645 per month.

Finally, initial access to a target network is often available for sale on closed forums and marketplaces. This can include login credentials or vulnerabilities in a network that can be exploited to gain access, Initial Access or AI is typically the first ‘open door’ into a victim’s network and can lead to ransomware.

Prices for this service ranged wildly from a few hundred dollars to tens of thousands, due to wide ranging victims and seller motivations, varying greatly depending on access offered, method of access and compromised company.

The average price for initial access to a network is around $7,700. 

In conclusion, the dark web is a hub for a wide range of hacking services, from stolen credit card information to initial access to target networks.

While the prices for these services may seem steep, it’s important to remember that at least for some of the services offered there is a more demand than supply.

It is also important to note that there is no guarantee with any of the services provided and the sellers or marketplaces themselves could be scams or scammers although a majority do offer purchase through escrow.

Header photo by Jefferson Santos on Unsplash.

1 2 16 17 18 19 20 23 24
Privacy Settings
We use cookies to enhance your experience while using our website. If you are using our Services via a browser you can restrict, block or remove cookies through your web browser settings. We also use content and scripts from third parties that may use tracking technologies. You can selectively provide your consent below to allow such third party embeds. For complete information about the cookies we use, data we collect and how we process them, please check our Privacy Policy
Youtube
Consent to display content from - Youtube
Vimeo
Consent to display content from - Vimeo
Google Maps
Consent to display content from - Google
Spotify
Consent to display content from - Spotify
Sound Cloud
Consent to display content from - Sound